the13thfloor

Can somebody please tell me why an investment letter would use an unsubstantiated comment by Scott Ritter Commentary / ASK Researchin its postings. I listened to Ritter answer softball questions on liberal radio on monday. He stated that the Iraqi elections were manipulated by the U.S. authorities and based this accusation on pre election predictions by the shia mullahs that the shias would garner 60% of the vote. Some strong evidence to base an accusation on. Ritter then goes on to claim he knows that president Bush has signed off on an attack on Iran in June. Based on what? Unnamed sources. Face it, Scott Ritter is a fraud. He most likely received money from the oil for food scandal to help the Hussin regime. He is now gearing up to sell a book and needs the media coverage to make more money. This guy has mastered the Michael Moore methodology for spreading lies for proffit. Still the real question is why would an investment newsletter pass this on to its readers? You make the call.